Currently, I teach in a grade 6-8
Intensive Support Program (multiple exceptionalities). I have found that many of my students have a hard
time with open-ended thinking and questioning the world around them. While I
don’t think their exceptionalities necessarily limit them from this, I have found that much scaffolding is necessary to engage in inquiry.
Bringing the soil into the classroom allowed student with limited mobility to observe it close up. |
M.S. found a grub in the sample he chose! |
Student-created poster of their collective observations. Some are scribed comments from students using Speech-Generating Devices. |
After observing things in the soil, and consulting some authoritative sources, we sorted out living and non-living things we has seen or knew existed in soil. |
After separating the soil sample with water, this student used his Speech-Generating Device to ask about what rose to the top. |
Observations from a student with writing abilities. Other students had their Observations scribed. |
As a group we discussed what they knew about living and
non-living things.
Based on these characteristics, I asked for their ideas
about how we could test their theory that soil was a living thing. Internally, I
debated going right to an authoritative source, but wanted them to go through
the process of figuring out how to find an answer through their own
investigation.
Since living things need food, the students decided that we would feed a sample of soil see if the soil would eat it.
We observed the
lettuce for a few weeks, while consulting some authoritative sources in the
meantime (books, online).
We then went on to observe a few different types of soil and
compare them through a number of experiments. In the end they added their new
learning to the ‘soil graffiti’ poster they had created after their initial observations.
Rock sample after a few weeks |
Soil sample after a few weeks |
No comments:
Post a Comment